Barring the Gate After the Students Have Left the Law School Stables
According to various reports on the JD Underground forum, some states (such as Michigan) have begun increasing the requirements for Bar Exam passage, presumably in an attempt to reduce the number of new attorneys entering the field.
While I applaud (if true) the desire to reduce the number of new attorneys, I feel that failing people on the Bar Exam is the wrong way to go about it. The barrier to entry should be placed before anyone enters law school and before people invest three years and over $100,000 on unneeded higher education. The state bars are just further victimizing victims of the law school scam. If they want to reduce the number of new JDs they should just declare that only graduates of certain law schools (say the top 50 law schools) are eligible for admission and then grandfather in anyone who entered law school prior to the announcement.
1 comments:
Exactly! Real professional schools, i.e. medicine, dental and veterinary, limit the number up front. The ABA pigs, of course, claim that they don't want to "discriminate" against under-represented groups.
Apparently, it is mor humane to slap down low-income students and minorities - i.e. people who typically have little to no connection - with $120K in NON-DISCHARGEABLE debt, than it is to deny them the opportunity of a "legal educaTTTion."
In the end, these "educators" are selfish dogs who do not give one damn about their students or recent grads. They simply want to make sure that the federal student loan gravy train continues to roll along.
Post a Comment